soft determinism造句

• While commentators such as Castells espouse a " soft determinism " whereby they contend that " Technology does not determine society.
• ""'Soft determinism " "', as the name suggests, is a more passive view of the way technology interacts with socio-political situations.
• A slightly different variant of soft determinism is the 1922 technology-driven theory of social change proposed by William Fielding Ogburn, in which society must adjust to the consequences of major inventions, but often does so only after a period of cultural lag.
• The article was titled " Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It, " but it is widely misquoted as " Involving Determinism . " His biographer, Loyd Easton, correctly describes it as " an acute example of'soft determinism'or'reconciliationism'."
• In 1884 James set the terms for all future discussions of determinism and compatibilism in the free will debates with his lecture to Harvard Divinity School students published as " The Dilemma of Determinism . " In this talk he defined the common terms " hard determinism " and " soft determinism " ( now more commonly called " compatibilism " ).
• John Culkin ( 1967 ) summed up McLuhan's position with the quote, " we shape our tools and thereafter they shape us ", suggesting a transactional approach to media . " This statement from Strate would define McLuhan and Media Ecology as " soft determinism " opposed to " hard determinism " with the difference being that " hard determinism " indicates that changes to society happen with no input or control from the members of that society, whereas " soft determinism " would argue that the changes are pushed by technology but free will and agency of the members of society ultimately have a chance to influence the outcome.
• John Culkin ( 1967 ) summed up McLuhan's position with the quote, " we shape our tools and thereafter they shape us ", suggesting a transactional approach to media . " This statement from Strate would define McLuhan and Media Ecology as " soft determinism " opposed to " hard determinism " with the difference being that " hard determinism " indicates that changes to society happen with no input or control from the members of that society, whereas " soft determinism " would argue that the changes are pushed by technology but free will and agency of the members of society ultimately have a chance to influence the outcome.